What have we seen with the new Dean in 2013 ASC AGM? Don’t you think he is also another instrument
used by BAV? This sign is revealed clearer in ASC most recent AGM. Who
designed the voting to be upfront before accepting all the reports so that
everyone can vote? Was it not by the
Dean? Was getting everyone’s vote a bad idea at all? It is certainly very
convincing. As usual, this is one of BAV’s
old tricks. The PCC had warned the chair there was legality issue to dissolve them
before they report. Why was this idea so desperately carried through?
Now we know BAV’s desperate game plan with the purpose of getting
everyone's vote was to win especially through those innocent minds mostly the BM
congregations were ignorant to know who they were voting and what they were
doing. Shameful to know some
pastors and priests who had started to campaign
weeks before the AGM to exploit these innocent BM people to vote against people who are not of BAV’s choice.
Do these pastors and priests know what they are doing? Are they
follower of Jesus Christ or BAV? Do they know the difference between good and
evil? Do they know the difference between the truth and
the lies? Who is dividing the church because of power and money? What has our church become now? Are we lead by a den of robbers and thieves or
people who are fervent to serve God and the people?
Why then the BM voters so obedient to vote according to their pastors’
and priests’ choice? Their simplistic answers were to follow the instructions of
their cell leader, pastors and priest. They have no ideas who were the candidates,
who can do a good job and what the church is up to. All they know is they get
well treated all the time with meals and transports to attend events like this.
Is this not the sin of selfishness of these leaders in white robes exploited
the situation just to win for the sake of winning to gain control and power?
Why were the candidates of the priests and pastors’ choices placed
upfront? Photos of the BM and new Chinese warden and PCC members were arranged prominently and conspicuously first in the
line-up for
selection among other existing candidates. Why? What
was the message then? Is this what we
call good change to have people of the priests' choice to dominate the council? Are we not
seeing BAV having an upper hand to put a new Dean to stir the Chinese
congregations in the council as puppets?
Do we have confidence in the members of the new council?
Why was a resigned
priest standing in for nomination being questioned repeatedly and deliberately
whether he is still a priest? Why were
the independence and good conduct of other nominees not questioned instead? Do you know at least 4 new elected members into the council now are
parties related to the Dean and the Bishop? Do we still have the confidence in them?
Why is BAV so engrossed to the affairs of ASC’s AGM despite he was instructed by the HOB to go
on sabbatical leave? Were you aware he has been monitoring the situation of the
AGM remotely with the presence of his wife giving him constant live update? Who is playing God? Do we continue to let BAV (the devil) be God
or let God be God? Can we honour God’s
name if the devil is playing God?
Is it not evil power continue to dominate the church leaders into darkness? Why are the church leaders so reluctant to walk in the light? But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin. 1 John 1:7. Good Friday reminds us the price Jesus had paid on the cross.
Is it not evil power continue to dominate the church leaders into darkness? Why are the church leaders so reluctant to walk in the light? But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin. 1 John 1:7. Good Friday reminds us the price Jesus had paid on the cross.
