Another Day of History is Marked at the ASC Adjourned AGM

It was reported the first history that the AGM of ASC earlier on 6 April 2014 had to be adjourned because the new treasurer Bobby Tan and the Dean had produced an unbalanced & unaudited financial statements.  The minutes recorded by the secretary for the 2013 AGM were also erroneous.   The AGM has proceeded in English but when members highlighted the mistakes of the secretary, she got agitated and raised her voice to reply in Bahasa Malaysia.  The AGM had to be adjourned to 29 June 2014 because the minutes reported wrong date and time of the 2013 AGM and contents were factually erroneous.  It was a total waste of time to call for members to the AGM be presented with such a shabby report. Dean Chak is now reaping the harvest of his own labour sowed a year ago. Whose fault to blame other than Chak himself and his aides?  Chak had solicited the bogus voters from the members mostly from the BM service, the domestic maids and the gardeners who did not know who they were voting to do the job other than instructions from the leaders and staff of the church.

Some of the interesting facts worth to explore further from the adjourned AGM were as follows:

1. Why is it so ambiguous that the auditor who has been in practice for so long didn't want to put his signature as a person?
2. Is the audit report legal and valid?
3.  Why Diocesan Chancellor Datuk Stephen Foo again appeared to give ill advice that the members should vote to accept the financial statements despite some members proposed not to be accepted?
4.  When some qualified members offered help to do the work free of charge, the Dean chose to pay his good buddy to do the work for a fee with many excuses nobody wanted to take up the job.  Thereafter failed to produce the audited financial statements in the earlier AGM. Why?
5.  Observation to be continued if Chak continues with his auditor buddy for the year 2014 financials despite 2 names of honorary auditors were put forward.
6.  Will the PCC bothered to make those amendments after it was voted to accept despite some members raise doubts?

Members came with great expectation to hear from the new treasurer to explain the financials but he appeared very much inept.  He only could blame he had no information to the figures prior to 2006.  Does this sound like they are trying to put the blame to people prior to BAV? There were few merry go rounds between the new treasurer and the new auditor but still they could not answer to the hard core questions posed by some members who knew no non sense to the financials.

There are lots of capable professionals in ASC and it is a sad case to see how the pastors and priests had manipulated the Church of Jesus Christ for the sake of one man no other than BAV. The professionals do proper work.  Chak had to act foolish to condone to BAV’s scheming so he can please his boss. In future, members will not waste their time to attend ASC AGM with that sort of reporting quality. The secretary could not speak English in the AGM conducted in English. What more can we expect good reports from her? Poor reporting indicates no confidence in the leaders, which leads to low attendance and low contributions in terms of money. ASC is in the mess.  The financial state had gone worse with the inept new treasurer playing the role of the clown.  

It is now time for repentance for the leaders of ASC, from the priest and pastors who had been selfish in the previous AGM manipulated with the votes to enable people of their choice as PCC. ASC members had been gracious to wait and see the performance of the PCC voted in by bogus voters but these PCC had made it the worst in the history of ASC 2014 AGM.

We declare Victory for the Lord and the Message is clear!

The Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) had its first meeting on 23 May 2012 and the Court of Appeal granted the Appeal to the Complainant on 23 May 2014 that Ecclesiastical court (E Court) is to be convened by the HOB and a copy of the recommendation by the PAC to be released to the complainants.  More fairness has been brought into light. Exactly 2 years and what a coincidence on the dates and surely God had affirmed the voice of the righteous is not to be ignored and He is ALIVE giving HOPE to those who have been praying unceasingly.

What happened to the 3 bishops referred to as the House of Bishops “HOB” between year 2012 and now? Had they been bought over by the generous love gifts of RM50,000 cash from the Diocese of Sabah initiated by BAV? If their thinking were rational enough, that amount of RM50,000 was only a small crumbs of BAV spent for his holidays to United States, England with his wife and also the luxury cars Toyota Alphard, Honda CRV he bought using the DOS’ money and not to mention the millions that went to Thailand through Philip Lo’s personal account.   Yet, the Diocesan Treasurer Michael Tong had the face to lie through his teeth to allow his relative Herbert Tong to declare in the thanksgiving service that the accounts of the Diocese of Sabah were in order.  How can we trust him? He could not even tell the members how many signatories to the bank accounts of the DOS when asked in the dialogue. If so he declared the accounts in good order, why were the accounts since 2006 not being re-audited as requested by the members?  How to convince the members there is no mishandling of money if everything else was swept under the carpet with a convenient sweeping statement? 

We have been reminded constantly by BAV in his preaching about Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5:3-4. Why? BAV must have been bearing with the guilt from God on the messages but due to greed for worldly processions and power it has been too difficult for him to refuse and get on to the disobedience with God.

Time has come that the Lord says it is Him who shall reign and rule the Church because the Church belongs to the Lord. The church is not meant for those who want to abuse, corrupt and being malicious.  We hope the HOB will fear God than man.

All these while HOB had defended themselves desperately even to the extent of losing their status as a non-legal entity in the earlier High Court session. All these were just to deny their duty to convene E Court to put the Church of Jesus Christ back into the right biblical perspective.  Why were they so foolish? Had the appellant and the church not bothered to appeal to put right the status of the Diocese formed in the Province and the rightful duties of the HOB under the constitution, the Provincial Diocese that has been built over the past many years by the previous faithful bishops and clergies would have been down to the history to carry its defunct duty as a non-legal entity. The short term convenience for the current HOB was too great of the impact to its long term effect of defunct status. 

We hope the HOB will be more serious in their biblical stand as the Head of the Diocese in the province. It would be very foolish of them to appeal to the Federal Court to reinstate their non-legal entity status of which they compromised and messed themselves up for the sake of one sick man, the devil of all evils.  The whole world is watching how they handle and charge their spiritual duties over this devil whom has been the complaint of many members with the abuse of power, greed for money for personal gain, slander to those who serve God faithfully, wicked to those who walk righteously and you can name all the unbiblical acts.  

When BAV was struck with cancer, was it not God has spoken it is time for the Church to have a new leader? Leaders, awake and stop sinning! God had spoken many times and to many different people Ezekiel 34 but none has feared God.  The HOB has been too gentle and kind to the extent that God’s standard has been compromised. Why had they allow BAV to rule and divide further when God has already spoken to us so clearly a new Shepherd is to be appointed to lead the church? 

“Ezekiel 34 :7 “Therefore, you shepherds, hear the word of the Lord: ⁸ As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign Lord, because my flock lacks a shepherd and so has been plundered and has become food for all the wild animals, and because my shepherds did not search for my flock but cared for themselves rather than for my flock, ⁹ therefore, you shepherds, hear the word of the Lord: ¹⁰ This is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am against the shepherds and will hold them accountable for my flock. I will remove them from tending the flock so that the shepherds can no longer feed themselves. I will rescue my flock from their mouths, and it will no longer be food for them.”

Many may have said, BAV already struck with cancer, why are we not sparing him?  Had he not become more vicious than ever after he was struck with illness? People in general had been kind hearted towards him despite he had gotten the best perceived treatment from Singapore all under the expenses of the DOS yet not to the knowledge of many these could be sought after from the local hospital as confirmed by a local oncologist.  What more can we expect of BAV?  Despite his illness, BAV had demoted certain priests and demanded publicly certain pastors to resign.  Who has called these clergies to ministries? Was it BAV or God? 

Do we still want this kind of sick man to lead our Diocese? Rather, this sick man had disqualified himself physically and spiritually as the leader of the Diocese.  Why is the HOB having so much difficulty to charge their responsibility over him?  Need not to be trial in the E court he is already physically unfit to work as a person under the constitution.  The whole Diocese has been divided because of one selfish sick man.  In order to avoid further embarrassment, HOB should ask BAV to resign gracefully, surrender himself unto God in total repentance, realign his spiritual intimacy again with God and render apologies to all mankind he has ever offended, abused, slandered and cursed.  Only God will have the final say if he is granted a second chance again.