Pages

Blog Archive

Sunday 20 July 2014

A prayer of Spiritual Cleansing and Restoration of A New Beginning



We have seen how God dealt with the so call supposed to be anointed but due to greed and power had grieved the entire situation of the Church and the Diocese.

God has been gracious and patience to our crisis. The Lord reminded us, He is the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. It is He who installed for us and it is He who removed from us.  We grieve because we have to come to this stage.   

Let us stay focus now and pray that God will do a Spiritual Cleansing in the whole Diocese and Restore us clean again into a radiant bride ready for the coming of the bridegroom.

We ask for God's forgiveness because of the sins of our shepherds who had led us astray. We must pray that all the leftovers from the past era be nullified, cleansed, cut off and wiped off completely under the power of the Almighty God so that we have a new beginning to start off for the Diocese of Sabah. 

Pray for God’s cleansing power to come upon the priests, pastors, cronies, intercessors, who had submitted to the satanic power in wrong cultic and deceitful teaching, those who lost their calling to serve man than God, those who departed from the Holy Spirit, those who prayed to the forces of the darkness, those who oppressed others, those who had been arrogant, dishonest in handling God’s money, schemed to slander and destroyed the body of Christ with all sort of ungodly ulterior motives just to please their grand master for personal favors now be under the mighty power of God's Spiritual Cleansing.  

We pray for the House of Bishops who were deceived and blinded by the satanic power be shaken and striped before God. Let them be reminded God’s wrath can be equally upon them for their infirmity in Christ.  It is time that they fear God and their eyes be opened to fix on Jesus to see a new spiritual dimension to make the impartial stand for the new Diocese of Sabah.   

We pray for the standing committee to be transparent before God to clean up all the accounts that had been spent for personal consumptions by the leader without the knowledge of the committee and kept in the most secretive manner be striped open now before the Almighty God.

We pray for the next Bishop be a God fearing man and God’s anointed one to bring forth love, peace and unity back to the Diocese of Sabah with restoration of trust and relationship among clergies and laities be reconnected.

We dedicate this prayer unto the Lord. In Your mercy, Oh Lord. Hear our prayer. 

In Jesus' name we declare this powerful prayer.  Amen!

26 comments:

  1. First, have the family of AVCF left the Bishop Lodge in proper order after almost RM1m a few years ago? Other clergy were expected to leave/vacate house within 24 hours.

    The Bishop Lodge needs to be cleansed too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Church members must feel fortunate and express their thanks to Mary Vun for conveying Albert Vun’s message to them. She said her husband had forgiven their wrongdoings; her message, of course, appeared to be somewhat provocative to most of the church members.

    Church members are advised not to be irritated. In my opinion, the message should be interpreted as his (Albert Vun) complaints against their unfairness shown to him; that is, they have been hurling their criticism and insults at him only while ignoring the other accomplices sitting in the Standing Committee.

    They must realize the fact that Albert Vun alone could not siphon out such a huge sum of 30 over millions Ringgit from the Diocese’ resources without the technical assistance from those professional people in the SC.

    In the Standing Committee, there are two lawyers, one valuer, and one public accountant. Very much to our regret, we find out that the two lawyers tend to go against the law; the valuer does not fully understand how to value a piece of land; and the public accountant fails to distinguish between expenditure and fixed assets.

    It is time to investigate the SC, pressing them to conduct a forensic audit of the accounts is the only way to recover the hugely misappropriated fund.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Target,

    This is crying over spilt milk and unforgiveable as far as AVCF is concerned as he had stated his position very clearly while still alive since 2011 and with all those whistleblowing he could have obtained a second opinion rather than just state his "prerogative" power.

    Now the audit of ADOS is unconstitutional done by an audit firm when the Constitution specifically state "honorary auditor".

    As bishop then AVCF could have instituted a committee of inquiry as I had always demanded in three blogs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seems like Micheal Tong being the treasurer alone decided to let outsider audit? He made a statement in the dialogue that audit of the previous 2 years will be done by independent auditor.

      Strange enough nothing had been pursued and the excuses given by Micheal were nobody wanted to do the audit. Quietly that has been put aside and now he declares current year audit is done. This auditor is his good rotary friend travel to cruise together few times a year.

      Accountants, maybe some of you can explain, if expenses already spent in the past years it will never be shown in the current year expenses right unless you check the past years? Now only look at current year, does it mean we can declare the accounts are clean???? In my little knowledge in accounts I don't thing so.

      AV already died, we should clean the house and open up the books. As a church, make a stand and declare the accounts be opened up for audit to clear the doubts of people for restoration to move forward. Once and for all we state what is illegal, what is legal spending so that no other successors will not do like what AV had done.

      Only God can judge. Newspaper reported AV in his sermon challenged who had not stolen any money to put up their hands and he self declared nobody.

      You know how I read what he was saying????? He must have been stealing and he thinks it is ok to steal and he has been stealing all the time because he was doing God's work, God owes him a favour and will forgive him again. I feel sorry for him

      Delete
  4. Now that AV is dead,his name is still very much '"alive" everywhere especially in coffee shops and gatherings of any sorts! Many were astonished at the way the Vuns came out with their eulogies during the funeral.The young son came out "firing" without knowing head or tail of the real situation and they all agreed-Like Father like Son!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous,

    What you say about open the books would be done by the proposed "Commission of Truth and Reconstruction" and members should all demand for that and raise the fund to do that professionally and then a full Report to be published and made public to clear all the lingering doubts in the minds of most people.

    No doubt AVCF has been stealing as his LOVE for money is so great as he is also a glutton of good food and the question here is that where is the money now? How could he spend all those money stolen from God? Maybe his Will must be made public.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Stephen Foo sits at the Provincial Advisory Board. If the HOB listen only to the recommendation and the advisory of the present committee (mostly AV's cronies) to select the Vicar general and the new bishop, DOS is going into a doom future.

    We hope the HOB has come back to their senses

    ReplyDelete
  7. All eyes are on HOB now.Do they read our blogs or not?Do they know the feelings of the sheep? They should consult our past 2 retired bishops to get to the real truth.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Commission of Truth and Reconstruction

    http://bishopgateinanglicansabah.blogspot.com/2014/07/do-something-now.html


    ReplyDelete
  9. A lot of people said they were disgusted to see the " man from the grave" spoke from his grave last Sunday.How many more times do they have to watch this " crying bishop"-every Sunday? They went to the church to hear God's word not AV's word!!! Those that walked out was obvious that the service was meaningless.What was the aim of showing AV's CD?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope Chak is more sensible to pray so that God will speak through him for better sermon rather than being lazy to replay the deadman's sermon again from the graveyard which is full of heresy.

      He was hospitalised lah when he diagnosed for chemo treatment in Spore. Why he say he was never hospitalised Painting a nicer picture for his sermon & to make people think good of him?

      He encourage people to steal. It is ok to steal as everyone has stolen before and God will forgive. Not biblical to adopt his teaching. Especially for AV he did more work for God, so God owes him a great deal of favour and it is ok for him to take God's money.

      Av wanted to preach and die like the late priest AV murdered Rev Dais Rukuman as he has said it many times before he wants to die preaching but God didn't grant him that glory as he wished. What was the message to us?

      There isn't any tribute to AV. If there is, people would had gone to attend his funeral service but the family members didn't make it. So be it.

      It is entirely ridiculous to show his sermon and played again for show. If he wanted to speak to the people in the 7.30am service, he would had done so in that 9 months of life God gave him extra. He chose not to speak to us how can the wife & son dictates he has forgiven us? The wife and son should had apologise on his behalf.

      Nothing to inspire from this man. He has come to realised God had taken everything from him. He was devastated and weak but he didn't wish to die and he never said sorry. Sad ending but he lost to God.

      Delete
  10. Did anyone see the DEATH certificate of avcf? Did anyone see the corpse of AVCF? Did anyone touch the corpse of AVCF? If so, please do an affidavit on the remains of AVCF?

    Why is AVCF still "preaching" in ASC at 7.30am which avcf was avoiding for more than two past years?

    Why allow remote control as if he is still alive as Dean Chak still scared of him?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Albert Vun, resolutely believed to be the second son of God by all the bishops (including the retired ones), the priests, the Standing Committee and some of his supporters, had died of pancreatic cancer on the 15th of July, 2014. On the third day of his death, his family staged a “resurrection show” in the funeral service held at the ASC.

    A pre-recorded senseless sermon was given on that particular day and it had overwhelmed all the attendants (except those representatives from other churches). This “unprecedented show” had of course deepened their “faith” in their lord rather than our Lord Jesus.

    On last Sunday, this tainted man’s followers played the CD during the church service, trying to restore his contaminated reputation. However, instead of producing the desired result, those ignorant clergy are advised to steer clear of this ordinary man’s influence and help clean our God’s place.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is getting clearer of the vindictiveness of the man who always claimed that he never lost and that he would fight till the last days.

    So this possessed satanic man had found that "death" is likely the answer to escape from his self created scenario of doom for himself and now he is still dragging others into the HELL now or in the future.

    Imagine what Bolly knew at the "funeral" that he did not overwrite what was presented at the "funeral" service being the Archbishop of APSEA. If Bolly did not act then, how would others dare to do anything then.

    Now ADOS and ASC are under the "auto-pilot" or remote control of AVCF.

    Bolly has not done anything since 15th July, 2014 and ADOS should get the message from God that we must take control of God's Church especially ASC.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It is out of fairness to put all the blame on the Standing Committee after the death of their lord. After all, they are a group of ignorant people who were carefully selected by Albert Vun to accomplish his miraculous dreams during his sleep.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yes, pray and pull down the evil spirit of AV still heavily obsessed in the priests.Esp Good Sam Church and the young priest Sim Ka Seng had used the pulpit to scold his members.

    How can the priest get mad at people when God had dealt with AV? Do you think the people had kill AV? No! AV said himself "will you serve God for nothing"? What did he mean? He knew he has lost everything back to God.

    Rev Sim who is against the people writing on the blog but himself has his own blog.

    Rev Sim, please be reminded the pulpit should not be used to scold people. AV had abused the pulpit and we had seen how dishonored our God was. We just pray that this young priest will not follow the foot steps of his master. We pray that God is merciful and will give this young priest a chance to repent.

    This young priest was promoted so fast because he was closely associated with AV. His fiance is also AV's personal assistant. He had died hard for Stella Lo and AV. But we forgive him lah even he doesn't understand what is meant to apologise.

    ReplyDelete
  15. go there to reflect on what AVCF did in Good Sam as a young rector in the late 1980s--http://thetrutheng.com/2012/09/03/back-in-good-sam-days/

    Is Sim Ka Seng possessed by the evil of AVCF?

    ReplyDelete


  16. The publication of Diocesan Bulletin has given the signs of fake death in its delayed QUARTERLY publication March, June (did not come out) and why come out on 1st August? Also if your read the bulletin , you will see how many times LATE bishop came out and so when did AVCF died actually?

    Also in his “suffering” sharing he tried to play out emotion to get people on boat to believe he really died.

    ReplyDelete
  17. “Will you serve God for nothing? If you serve God for “something”, then you are not serving God, you are serving the ‘something’.”—From Bishop Albert Vun Cheong Fui.

    This is a very good message which serves to mock the members who, after knowing that the errant church leaders are misappropriating God’s money, still give their tithes generously and expect more ‘something’ in return.

    The message is applicable to the clergies in the Diocese as well. Ask yourself, clergy, are you serving God or Bishop Albert Vun?

    ReplyDelete
  18. The following are a series of emails between Philip Lee and the late Albert Vun presented for public reference.

    From the emails, Albert Vun, while queried by Philip about the improper bonus payment, had without alternative admitted that it was a mistake made by him for not listing down the names of the recipients. Was the money really paid to the clergy? Evidently, God’s money had been used by Albert Vun without any restraint.

    Philip is just an ordinary member from Christ Church and he does not have any accounting knowledge. Being a righteous member, he was obliged to seek clarification from Albert and we must honor his good deed.

    Church members are a loss to explain why the Diocesan Honorary Treasurer, Michael Tong who is also a public accountant, has never expressed his opinion about the irregularities in the church finances. Church members felt that he had tacitly accepted the maze-like Diocesan Financial Report by not objecting to it. Is he one of the accomplices who had assisted Albert Vun to misappropriate church funds?

    The emails.....

    ReplyDelete
  19. The e-mails ………
    To vunalbert@gmail.com
    Dec 4, 2012
    Date: 04/12/2012
    To : The Right Revd. Datuk Albert Vun, Bishop of Sabah.

    From: Philip Lee ( member of Christ Church)
    Dear Bishop Albert Vun,
    Re ACCUSATION OF ILL-GOTTEN MONEY
    I was saddened to learn from the “The Truth” that you have, under the excuse of making payment of bonus to the clergies, cashed out RM 100,000 from the Diocese Bank Account.

    It was also said that no payment voucher was issued for the recipients to acknowledge receipt of the so-called bonus payment. Don’t you realize that you have violated the accounting rule? Don’t you realize that your violation has raised doubt about your integrity—church members suspected that you have misappropriated church money?
    Being a senior member in Christ Church, I have confidence in you and I do believe that the accusation against you is probably calculated to defame you. If your conscience is clear, I hope you would take action to refute the rumors by listing all the names of the recipients and the respective amount paid.
    Again, I must reiterate that I have my undivided trust in you and I hope that it is not misplaced.
    I look forward to receiving your explanation at your convenience.
    Regards,
    Philip Lee of Christ Church, K.K.
    Email : philiplee602@yahoo.com
    ——————————————————————————
    vunalbert
    Dec 4, 2012
    Dear Philip,
    This was done end of last year on the principle which was agreed in our salary terms n conditions, that we reward those who worked harder, n for clergy n pastors from smaller churches where no bonuses were paid. I shared with the Stand Com. the Treasurer n accounts staff were in the know. The Diocesan office staff were given about 1 month’s pay each. The rest distributed to clergy n pastors. $1000 to $2000 each. we have 60 over clergy n pastors. Yes, we didn’t have a full name list. That was my mistake.
    In the future, we will do a full name list, if we do this again. Now there is a group trying to discredit me. I have led the best I could in the right spirit. If you don’t trust me on this, I also cannot do anything now. I’m taking time off to pray if the Lord wants me to serve someway else..
    Please help to pray for the church n help to built unity.
    Blessing
    Bishop
    Sent from Samsung tablet
    ———————————————————————————————-
    vunalbert@gmail.com
    Dec 5, 2012
    Dear Philip
    I just checked with the Diocesan office this afternoon, last year, we used $85,000 (not $100,000) for the clergy and staff year-end gifts. Just to set the record right.
    Thanks..
    Bishop
    ————————————————————————————–
    vunalbert@gmail.com
    Dec 7, 2012
    Dear Philip
    I am disappointed that my sincere reply to your mail (which I thought came out of genuine concern), to help clarify to you what we did to give year-end gifts to our Diocesan staff and also clergy of small-town and interior churches, was given to Clarence Fu whom you know will use the mail against me. Have you check Clarence Fu, track record as a priest – both in his management of finance and in his dealing with people, especially of opposite sex? Do you know how, as his bishop, I have reached out to him to help him. So, don’t be taken into believing negative things people said about the bishop without checking out who are the people spreading the bad report and what motivates them.
    Out of courtesy, you should at least make known to me that you are making my reply to you public. How can I trust you as a member of our church when my reply to you – out of a sincere heart, is now used against me.
    Anyway, before the Lord, I have dealt with you in kindness and respect, but you have not done so to me. As far as I know, I have been in anyway unkind to you and your family. May the Lord Himself be our Judge.
    Bishop A Vun
    ——————————————————————————————————

    ReplyDelete
  20. To vunalbert@gmail.com
    Dec 8, 2012
    Dear Bishop Vun,
    I apologize to you for not getting your approval before sending out your reply to a few persons whom I know (Clarence Fu was not included).
    I just wanted to tell them that I appreciated your reply and I have unconditionally accepted your explanation. My original motive was to stop the negative opinion about you from spreading around. In view of the present chaotic situation, I felt it necessary to share with them because it is my duty to clarify the matter on your behalf.
    I thank you for telling me about the character of Clarence and it will be taken as a guideline to handle similar matters with them in the future.
    Again, I am sorry for causing you the unexpected trouble.
    Best regards,
    Philip Lee
    —————————————————————-
    Date : 12 January 2013
    From : Philip Lee (email : philiplee602@yahoo.com)
    To : Bishop Albert Vun
    Dear Bishop Vun,
    I refer to your email which you sent to me on 7 Dec 2012 and wish to express my thanks for telling me some of the undisclosed stories about Clarence Fu. May I have your consent to disclose the said email to other church members for their information?
    After a thorough review of the past days’ happenings (including the court cases against you), I have decided to side with you in the church conflict and I assure you that I will do my best to influence those members who have negative judgment on you. I believe that you were made a victim of the Standing Committee and would advise you to be more prudent in handling church matters in the future.
    I sympathized with you for your being placed in quite a predicament at the dialogue with church members held at All Saints cathedral few months ago. I could feel the hurt you were inflicted by some disgruntled members and I hope that time will heal your wound.
    I pray that God will help us promote the peaceful development of priests-church members ties, bring unity to the church and guard the fundamental interests of the Anglican Diocese of Sabah.
    May God Bless you!
    Yours truly,
    Philip Lee of Christ Church
    ———————————————————————————————
    Albert Vun
    Jan 13, 2013
    Dear Philip
    Please do not share with others what I shared with you. It is not helpful to repay people evil for evil..my point to you is, you need to know the background of people n not believe what everyone is saying or posting on the blogs. And I want to put matters to rest not to stir up more controversices
    Pray for the Lord to intervene on behalf of the church.
    Bishop

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do not repay people evil for evil. BAV repaid people evil for more evil. He is dead and gone 6 feet under.

      It is very sad to read how a spiritual leader can bad mouth his own priest. Where is the love of Jesus in him? Even a small child knows how to forgive and be friends again with his enemy.

      We have not seen BAV apologise to people he offended. That is the most lacking element in the entire crisis. What legacy had he left behind? To all Cult members, who thought believe there is a legacy from BAV, please come before God and seek God instead of helping the dead man to fulfil his unfinished wish. God had forbidden what BAV had done. Think hard before any one continues what BAV had been doing if you fear God!

      Delete
  21. based on the emails between PLee and "late" avcf, it is a BIG lie again over the way bonus was handled.

    Have any one seen avcf's tax return? If so, you may learn that he paid himself a huge bonus at the end of December, 2012 just around the times he was no longer the Dean of ASC. So who actually was paid the huge bonus?? A special lady and for what??? your guess is as good as mine??

    Joshua

    ReplyDelete
  22. Melter Tais, who is a member of the “Unholy Trinity (Albert Vun, John Yeo and Melter Tais), has been appointed as the Vicar General for a period until the time when a new bishop is selected.

    This man had inherited the “bad personal quality” from the late Albert Vun; he babbled in one of the church occasions, stressing the need from the congregation to show their respect to all the clergy, and to condone their misdeed.

    As a Vicar General, he must understand that “respect” is gained in much the same way that we show it and is not from demanding. How could a man suspected of cheating God’s money be respected? Are the other clergy who never practice what they preach worthy of respect?

    He still can regain respect and bring unity to the church provided that he takes the following action to confess his sin to the congregation.
    1. He can tell them how much he and the other two ungodly men had obtained through the reciprocal exchange of love-gifts.
    2. He and the SC must welcome suggestions to have the Diocesan accounts audited so as to remove the doubts of embezzlement scandals.

    ReplyDelete
  23. We need to press for this ---

    We are aware that everything about the Synod 2014 was also

    illegal. There are much outstanding mess of Albert yet to be

    resolved. Was anything in Synod 2014 done in cleaning up such outstanding mess of the evil man Albert?

    So this important message ends with 7 key points namely:-

    1. Return the two Altars in All Saints Cathedral prior to 2016 and keep the Choir seats to the right side.

    2. Re-start the Kindergarten and the Sunday Schools.

    3. Cancel the Celebration Centre in All Saints Cathedral ground in its present form and location.

    4. The ‘demotion of Rev Moses Chin should be investigated or his position restored .

    5. The Court Documents in the Archbishop Case be made public and the decisions of the Appeal Court be implemented including the conduct of the Ecclesiatical Court in the absence of Albert Vun..

    6. .Install the Commission of Truth & Reconstruction.

    [the Terms of Reference already in the Bishopgate Blog].

    7. The Vicar General MJT should resign if no revamp effort is made.

    Joshua Y. C. Kong 15 September, 2014

    more there ---https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4364184221856948271#editor/target=post;postID=6903784927784719237;onPublishedMenu=posts;onClosedMenu=posts;postNum=2;src=postname

    ReplyDelete